23.5.05

Creation, Redemption, Baseball & the City of God: Part One

If you are just joining us on this topic, be sure to scroll down and read the introduction.


1. Creation is good.

This is our starting point to argue that there may in fact be baseball in Heaven. Unfortunately there has evolved in Christian thought throughout the centuries, a presupposition that the physical world is somehow less important, less "religious" than the spiritual world, or even that the physical world is somehow more corrupt or sinful than the spiritual world. Perhaps you are aware of the line of thinking in Christendom that says "I'm just a'passin' through. This body is just my shell, etc etc". This physical/spiritual dichotomy is not true and probably stems more from the influence of greek thought (Platonism) upon Christianity than from scripture itself. All of creation is created good. And all of creation is broken, suffering the effects of the fall into sin.

Consider: Genesis chapter one records for us scriptures account of the creation of the universe. Now at this point many more questions may be raised about this account. Is it historical? Is it allegorical? Are the "days" literal 24 hour days? What about evolution? It is not our intention to answer any of these questions in this discussion. So set those questions aside for now. The point we must take note of here is that after each stage of creation, God declares that what he has made is "good".

1:4 - And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness.
1:10- God called the dry land Earth,* and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was good.
1:12 - The earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed according to their own kinds, and trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
1:18 - the sun to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good.
1:21- So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
1:25- And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
1:31- And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good.

So again and again throughout the creative period, God stops to observe what he has made and to enjoy it, calling it good. Six times he says it. And then after making mankind on the sixth day, God declares it "Very Good!" If God has called something good, we ought not call it bad! We ought not call it unimportant, trivial or even "neutral". Nothing is neutral. What God has created is good. He says so.


2. The development of culture, though mediated by man, is an important part of God's Creation.

Ok, but what about baseball? I mean it's not like God made baseball in the same way he made the sea and the animals. This is true, but there is more to be said. God creates man & woman "in his own image". This little phrase has many many ramifications, but for our discussion we will note that being in the image of God means that we are little creators the way God is the Big Creator. We are little rulers of creation the way God is the Big Ruler of creation. God shares with men and women something of himself that is not shared with other aspects of the created world. And after making man & woman, God gives them the command to rule over what he has made. Theologians have called this the "cultural mandate" whereby mankind is given the job of developing culture in a responsible way. Here's the text:

Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

Then later in the book of Genesis we read of the beginnings of cultural development:
Gen. 4:19-22
And Lamech took two wives. The name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah. Adah bore Jabal; he was the father of those who dwell in tents and have livestock. His brother’s name was Jubal; he was the father of all those who play the lyre and pipe. Zillah also bore Tubal-cain; he was the forger of all instruments of bronze and iron.

In this passage filled with strange names we see the first seeds of argicultural development & animal breeding, of music and the arts, and even of technology as tools are forged from bronze and iron. This is the development of culture and it records for us the obedience of mankind in fulfilling the God given cultural mandate. If you enjoy music, you own something to Jubal. If you've ever eaten a hamburger, you have some debt to Jabal. If you are reading this on a computer then thank Tubal-cain. And if you enjoy the sport of baseball, then thank Abner Doubleday for his obedience to the cultural mandate in Genesis 1:28.

In addition to the cultural mandate, and the recording of culture's first baby steps in Genesis 4, we have also to consider the entire trajectory of the Christian view of history's unfolding. Civilization starts with two naked people in a garden and culminates in a city with streets and gates and nations and music and architecture (Revelation 21). In between these two is implied a necessary development of civilization and culture that is a part of God's plan. And it is God honoring for any person to participate in the unfolding of God's plan of cultural development, regardless of wether that person is a Christian or even believes in God at all. I don't know who first bred German Shepherds. I don't know what his religious beliefs were. But I'm glad he did it, because I love my dog. I don't know if Elvis was a believer or not, but I sure am glad he made a giant leap forwards for the development of rock and roll, because I love rock and roll. And sure am glad that Al Gore invented the internet, because I enjoy blogging.

Now granted, this develpoment of culture is for a time, distorted and broken by sin, but it is not obliterated. In otherwords, yes, sin has scarred the process of cultural development so just as we forge implements from bronze for good purposes, we forge implements for killing that were never intended to be a part of God's creation. Just as our artists develop their skills in painting and photography and film in ways that are beautiful, dignifying and honoring of God, we also have invented pornography, Nazi propoganda, and Thomas Kincaid paintings. But this distortion of cultural development is a cancer, a parasite. If your dog gets a tick, you don't shoot the dog. The dog is good and so you seek to remove the tick. The dog is worth saving, because he is good. God says so.

If baseball is good then it too is worth saving. more to come...

10 comments:

Matt said...

All cool.

Still doesn't address Matt's question:

"Baseball was used as a vehicle, only for me to point out the absurdity of a place where there is not failure or pain. I know you partially addressed this issue with me in person, but I want to clarify that I used the question as a tool....A tool to help people recognize the meaninglessness of a world in which pain is not experienced...To help people recognize the meaninglessness of a world in which ignorance is not experienced...etc etc"

And I know you said that, "Now I have a better grasp of the purpose of your question. I'll be able to address your question better..."

so...waiting ;-)

What is "heaven" if not absurd without failure, success, pain, pleasure, wisdom, ignorance...?

Greg said...

Matt B,

I also wrote this...

"However, I'll also follow up on the track I've already begun so we don't leave others hanging mid-discussion"

Right now I'm following up on what I thought the intent of the question was, as there are other readers who want to know. After establishing the possibility of baseball in heaven I will address the idea that heaven without failure, pain, etc is absurd. (In fact we will see that it is not). But were getting there. Thanks for reading and thanks for your patience.

Also, just curious. Do I know Matt B? How did you come across the blog?

FP

Gettinger said...

Yes, I see there is a cultural mandate but isn't it a stretch to say that man is a little creator?

I would say that it is more like God has delegated this task of subduing his creation. That would make Him the Big Delegator and us the little subordinates.

Matt said...

Greg -

check out my blog...if that doesn't help you know who I am...well...go to my website ;-)

http://graffiti-justwhatsonmymind.blogspot.com

www.graf-fiti.com

Greg said...

Less Famous Homer,

Essentially we are saying the same thing. If the term "little creator" makes us uncomfortable, another term can be used. When I say it I mean it in two senses:

1. "Little creators" in the same sense we use the term "creativity". Certainly all people express creativity in some way. To express creativity is to "image" God, the primary Creator. Animals do not do this. Only man who is in the image of the Big Creator. Thus "little creators".

2. "Little creators" in a more strictly theological sense. Mankind in being subduers of creation actually bring into being things which previously were not. Now granted, we don't create from nothing (ex nihilo) as only God is a creator in that sense. But God does bring us alongside himself for the purpose of continuing the unfolding of his creative work. We are made participants in God's creative work. A big deal!

So I'm not married to the terminology, but I am passionate about the concepts. God incorporates our contributions into his creative plan. Like a father who builds a house and has his little boy hold boards and hand him tools, and even drive a nail or two. We are little builders.

Greg said...

Matt b,

gotcha.

Greg

Greg said...

Absolutely! Of course I don't see all of them, as I too am blinded in part by the assumptions of our age. The goal is to continually be transformed by the renewing of our thinking according to scripture's perspective. To think God's thoughts after him as Einstein said. But here are a couple of ways we are not being responsible stewards:

1. Disregard for the environment.

2. Disregard for the unborn.

3. The Church's abdication of the duty to care for the widowed, the orphaned and the poor.

4. The Church's continued modeling of self-imposed racial segregation.

Gettinger said...

Greg,

Right. I agree with the concept, but I guess I am more comfortable with a limited definition of creator. When I think creator, I think ex nihilo, something from nothing, type creation. Not just rearranging the stuff we have been given.
You say that animals do not express creativity. Next time you take SuperJack to the zoo, check out the chimps. They do some amazing things with their own feces. Way more creative than most humans would be given the same pallet. ( I am thinking of one exception. A certain wrestler that we both knew. )

Greg said...

Just for the sake of discussion, why are you more comfortable with a limited definition of creator?

Gettinger said...

I guess I don't know exactly why but I have never compared 'big c' Creation with 'little c' creation.
Given some wood, nails and tools, I can make a birdhouse. Given a vast expanse of nothing, I could not speak that birdhouse into existence.
I think, because of that my brain does not connect the two actions/concepts. It wants to keep them separate.