27.5.05

Calvin & The President

I recently read this article and was encouraged by it. This one sentence resonated with me greatly: "We are not right wing; we're not left wing. We think our faith trumps political ideology." Read the rest below.

Bush's Calvin College surprise
by Jim Wallis

As I've traveled the country this spring - 82 events, 48 cities, and hundreds of media interviews since January - I've witnessed a new movement of moderate and progressive religious voices challenging the monologue of the Religious Right.

An extremely narrow and aggressively partisan expression of right-wing Republican religion has controlled the debate on faith and politics in the public square for years. But that is no longer true.

At packed book events around the country these days, I often make an announcement that elicits a tumultuous response: "The monologue of the Religious Right is finally over, and a new dialogue has begun!" Smiles light up the faces of thousands of people as they break out in thunderous applause.

That new dialogue was visible recently at Calvin College. Karl Rove, seeking a friendly venue for a commencement speech in Michigan, approached Calvin and offered President Bush as the speaker. The college, which had already invited Nicholas Wolterstorff of Yale to deliver the speech, hastily disinvited him and welcomed the president. But the White House apparently was not counting on the reaction of students and faculty. Rove expected the evangelical Christian college in the dependable "red" area of western Michigan to be a safe place. He was wrong.

The day the president was to speak, an ad featuring a letter signed by one-third of Calvin's faculty and staff ran in The Grand Rapids Press. Noting that "we seek open and honest dialogue about the Christian faith and how it is best expressed in the political sphere," the letter said that "we see conflicts between our understanding of what Christians are called to do and many of the policies of your administration."

The letter asserted that administration policies have "launched an unjust and unjustified war in Iraq," "taken actions that favor the wealthy of our society and burden the poor, " "harmed creation and have not promoted long-term stewardship of our natural environment," and "fostered intolerance and divisiveness and has often failed to listen to those with whom it disagrees." It concluded: "Our passion for these matters arises out of the Christian faith that we share with you. We ask you, Mr. President, to re-examine your policies in light of our God-given duty to pursue justice with mercy...." One faculty member told a reporter, "We are not Lynchburg. We are not right wing; we're not left wing. We think our faith trumps political ideology."

On commencement day, according to news reports, about a quarter of the 900 graduates wore "God is not a Republican or a Democrat" buttons pinned to their gowns.

The events at Calvin, along with the growing crowds at our events around the country, are visible signs that the Religious Right does not speak for all Christians, even all evangelical Christians. What I hear, from one end of this country to the other, is how tired we are of ideological religion and how hungry we are for prophetic faith. The students and faculty at Calvin College are the most recent sign of that hunger.

5 comments:

p90me said...

Oh no, are you really reading Jim Wallis? I've been familiar with Jim for about a decade and he is still playing the same tired tune. He acts as if he is the Joh McCain of Christendom, but he has his agenda. He seeks the applause of many by acting so neutral; after all, God is not a Republican or a Democrat. But he, Jim Wallis, has clearly had a communistic agenda since his Post-American magazine came out in the 70's, later becoming Sojourners.

Jim has an ideology. He is a communist. Unfortunately that isn't a bad ideology to most Christians, but the evil it has unleashed in the past century far passes that of the NAZI's (who were simply National Socialists, so that is derived from the same evil). This Jim Wallis condemns every act of the U.S. Gov't, but supports just about any act of communists regimes and movements around the globe. Think of him condemning the Vietnamese refugees for fleeing the communist gov't and claiming they had a "consumer lifestyle". He might have adapted his message ("God is Not a Republican or Democrat"), the switch from Post-American to Soujourners should show his marketing savvy, but the content is the same.

The purpose is a full-blown critique of Jim, but any suggestion that he believes his faith trumps political ideology is a farce. He is a communist and believes it to be Biblical. His support of Khmer Rogue and Moe's revolution shoul make this clear. So, the next time you hear Jim Wallis declare that "God is Not a Republican or a Democrat" he is simply poisoning the well. Because for Jim God is a communist.

So, am I just a "right-winger" upset at their presence? No, I freely confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. The U.S. Gov't, George W. Bush, and the U.N. are not lord. Their authority and power are relativized in light of Jesus' Lordship. However, since I believe that Jesus is Lord, I believe that His Law is the standard in all societies and cultures. Every ruler, power, and authority owes his allegiance to King Jesus (Psalm 2, etc.). I believe the rulers are to be ministers of wrath (Romans 13), and to judge in righteousness, which includes not favoring the poor (Lv. 19). Jim will want to run with "principles", treating the prophet Amos as the original Communist Manifesto, but he dare not discuss specifics. He will be the first to be ashamed of the Law of God in the Old Testament. Jim's whole system is predicated on coveteousness and two different standards for the "rich" and the "poor". His ideology isn't trumped by the Scriptures, but he was warped and warfed the Scriptures to a communist ideology.

p90me said...

Oops, "the purpose IS NOT a full blow critique..."

Greg said...

Glad to see my most conservative and liberal friends are dialoguing. The funny thing is this... if you had to guess which one of these two guys (Matt or KDNY) use to travel around the country in an old VW bus and which one lives in small town bible belt Ohio... you'd be wrong! So much for stereotypes.

Keith, I don't know anything about Wallis, although I've really benefitted from a great deal of scholarship that has come out of Calvin (Marsden, Wolterstorff, Plantinga, all the arts and philosophy buys up there, I think even Rookmaker was there?). Also, any signs I see of evangelicalism cutting the cord that ties them to the Republican party is an encouragement to me. Not because I think the Republican party is evil or whatever, but because I think such close associations confuse the issues and are ultimately harmful to our Christian witness in the world. The same is true, I believe of the Black church's unreserved endorsement of the Democratic Party. Also harmful and confuses the issue. Can even act in manner that threatens our Christian liberty (I mean that as a theological concept, not a religious freedom concept- KDNY knows what I'm talking about) by constraining congregants to adhere to one politcal party or another. That's why this article encouraged me.

p90me said...

Hey Matt,

What in particular? The vietnamese comment is from the Sept '79 Sojourners. He is in cahoots with Ron Sider, so you can check out his "Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger" for Class A communism. Sojourners (www.sojo.org) is available on-line, so you can peruse the content there (keep in mind its morphing). If you are near a Christian college/university head down to their library for old copies of Sojourners, esp. from the early 80's when the cold war was still front and center. I don't know where you can get old copies of "Post-American", but that will give you a flavor of a young Jim Wallis (no acknowledgement of repentance to my knowledge). The evils of communism and Nazism are readily available.

My point is that the article doesn't stand on its own. Just read the first two paragraphs (actually the whole thing) and the rhetoric is plain. He starts a "dialogue", but the "religious right" is a "monologue". He is part of "progressive" and "moderate" groups (two groups for the dialogue to occur) opposed to the 'narrow' & 'partisan'. Jim is just as "narrow" and "aggressively partisan" as his opponents, but like all people that claim "tolerance", "open-mindedness", etc., they simply change the standards.

His whole "God is Not a Republican or a Democrat" doesn't stand on its own. Jim has an ideology. Sorry that I'm not aware of any thing he has on-line beyond sojo.org.

kdny

p90me said...

FP says, "Also, any signs I see of evangelicalism cutting the cord that ties them to the Republican party is an encouragement to me."

I agree, but with different reasons. I think they are inherently evil! O.k., that's a bit of a jokey joke, but I believe the Karl Roves of the GOP, as Dylan would say, see us as "pawns in the game" and, to quote more Dylan or paraphrase him, "God is not on their side". He told W. that they needed to bring out 3-4 million "evangelicals" to win the election, and he most certainly did. We are now, at best, receiving a few crumbs from the table and are viewed merely as a voting block.

At the same time, I agree that it confuses the issues. The Christian hope (and the traditional "Republican" message) is not in the Federal Gov't, but we have come to think that sanctification and/or salvation can come by the State, and W. is a spending and Fed. expanding machine. (Side: I think he has a sincere faith)

On the statement "God is Not a Republican or Democrat", what is really being said? Is God neutral to the issues? Has he given us autonomy and we can do whatever we want? If not, how then shall we live? The problem with the right and left is they aren't really providing an answer to Schaeffer's question, nor do I think Schaeffer did for that matter. Is there an answer to the question? Is God a theocrat? If Jesus is Lord of lords & King of kings, then they owe their allegiance to him, 'kiss the son lest he be angry'.

So, seeking to distance myself from both the right & the left, here is where I end up:

It shall come to pass in the latter days
that the mountain of the house of the Lord
shall be established as the highest of the mountains,
and it shall be lifted up above the hills;
and peoples shall flow to it,
and many nations shall come, and say:
"Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,
to the house of the God of Jacob,
that he may teach us his ways
and that we may walk in his paths
."
For out of Zion shall go forth the law,
and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
He shall judge between many peoples,
and shall decide for strong nations afar off;
and they shall beat their swords into plowshares,
and their spears into pruning hooks;
nation shall not lift up sword against nation,
neither shall they learn war anymore
;
but they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree,
and no one shall make them afraid,
for the mouth of the Lord of hosts has spoken.
For all the peoples walk
each in the name of its god,
but we will walk in the name of the Lord our God
forever and ever.